With digital technology scaling new heights, you find almost all gadgets going digital and cameras are no exception. From point and shoot cameras to DSLR, everything can be found in digital format these days. One may argue that since digitalization has been so rapid, DSLR should have replaced point and shoot camera. However, each has its own utility which keeps the market open for both.
BASIC DIFFERENCE BETWEEN DSLR & POINT AND SHOOT CAMERAS
Let us first understand the basic difference between the two.
Point and shoot cameras as the name suggests is a convenient pocket able camera, small as to fit on shirt top pocket, easy to use and with additional add on features which the earlier version don't have. These cameras have fixed lens with zooming facility and the lenses are cheap enough to impact price. DSLR come with a Camera body and lens cavity on which you can mount various compatible lens, be it a 35 mm, 55mm or 300 mm or telescopic lens. Now, these lenses are very different to those that you find on point and shoot cameras. There are around 9 to 12 elements with varying degrees within a lens. These lenses come separately, for a price, which at times maybe more than what the camera body alone would cost.
The question that arises is why go for a DSLR when the point and shoot cameras are cheaper? The answer is simple, Quality. The digital quality of a DSLR far exceeds that of a P&S Camera because they have a bigger image sensor. Note, bigger sensor does not automatically means higher mega pixels, a DSLR with say 12 megapixel sensor is much bigger and better, as far as capturing of details is concerned to a 12 mega pixel P&S Camera for the very reason that they have a higher mega pixel on a larger plate. Most end users only hear the term megapixel and buy based on higher megapixel stated without knowing the size of the actual sensor. There is also a deliberate attempt by most camera manufacturers to keep the end user confused with the concept of megapixels.
Whether to buy a P&S Camera or a DSLR depends on convenience and quality of shots that one wants. For an average domestic user any good P&S camera would do just fine. It is easier to carry and even a child can operate it with ease. Without indulging much into the details of the setting one can set these cameras in auto mode and click away. For those who want to do some serious photography, DSLR is highly recommended. With its ability to accommodate various lenses it opens up door for many possibilities in photography. DSLR are faster when it comes to start up, focusing, zooming and shutter lag. The optical view finder ensures that what you see through the reflex mirror is what you get. DSLRS have larger levels of ISO ranging from 60 to 3000 which allows flexibility in shooting under different light conditions. One of the things about DSLR is the depth of field it gives. The best DSLRs can be found with amazing Flipkart offers and Snapdeal couponsonline. I guess this is really an extension of its manual controls and ability to use a variety of lenses but a DSLR can give you depth of field that puts everything from foregrounds to background in focus through to nice blurry backgrounds. Having stated the above, there are some downsides to DSLR when compared to P&S cameras that they are bulky to carry, constant change in lenses are required to shoot different subjects. If you are on a Hill station and are using a 300 mm lens and suddenly you want to shoot a family portrait you may have to change back to an 18-55mm lens.
CONCLUSION
It is safe to conclude that a P&S camera and DSLR camera have different market of their own and hence there is actually no comparison except the technical aspects. While one suits the domestic market, the other reaches up to professional level.
Source : articlesbase.com
0 comments:
Post a Comment